David's Scientology home

Please visit my other project

where amazing people meet

Re: Woody can't answer this one!

By UNIXer@unix.xite.com (UNIXer)
Sun, 21 May 95 05:42:02 GMT

In article <noodleD8wIpJ.896@netcom.com>, noodle@netcom.com (Rick Sherwood) wrote: >R Agent (rogue@ccs.neu.edu) wrote:
>: In each of them, reaction to Scientology has been negative, and
>: reaction to a.r.s activists has been positive.
>
> Come on, RA, give me the rest. Woody
Should I, or shall someone else send him the ENTIRE list of all 40,000 newsgroups? (DUH... mail bombed by REQUEST) You know, I could have my newsserver echo EVERY post in all those newsgroups to your e-mail address if you're not sure.

Let me know buddy... lots of communication is GOOD! Killfilling is bad. :(

I'm there for you!

-+= |UNIXer| *+*       "That guy who's return address doesn't work" (TM)
-+= | KoX  | *+*     8 million STILL?! Couldn't it at least be 8,000,001?
-+= |Slack!| *+*             "Anonymity is a shield from tyranny"
-+= | BOFH | *+*           Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens

noodle@netcom.com (Rick Sherwood) writes: "Attackers of the Church have been using the tactic of accusing the Church of what they [the church] have been doing." Freudian slip perhaps? Visit alt.religion.scientology and see for yourself!

Special Notice to the Cof$ +++ Welcome to the CyberCorporation +++ +++ "The Whole World is Watching" +++ Warning: Not for Amateurs