|
|
Re: Woody can't answer this one!
By UNIXer@unix.xite.com (UNIXer)
Sun, 21 May 95 05:42:02 GMT
In article <noodleD8wIpJ.896@netcom.com>,
noodle@netcom.com (Rick Sherwood) wrote:
>R Agent (rogue@ccs.neu.edu) wrote:
>: In each of them, reaction to Scientology has been negative, and
>: reaction to a.r.s activists has been positive.
>
> Come on, RA, give me the rest. Woody
Should I, or shall someone else send him the ENTIRE list of all
40,000 newsgroups? (DUH... mail bombed by REQUEST) You know, I could have
my newsserver echo EVERY post in all those newsgroups to your e-mail address
if you're not sure.
Let me know buddy... lots of communication is GOOD! Killfilling is bad. :(
I'm there for you!
-+= |UNIXer| *+* "That guy who's return address doesn't work" (TM)
-+= | KoX | *+* 8 million STILL?! Couldn't it at least be 8,000,001?
-+= |Slack!| *+* "Anonymity is a shield from tyranny"
-+= | BOFH | *+* Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens
noodle@netcom.com (Rick Sherwood) writes: "Attackers of the Church have been
using the tactic of accusing the Church of what they [the church] have been doing."
Freudian slip perhaps? Visit alt.religion.scientology and see for yourself!
Special Notice to the Cof$
+++ Welcome to the CyberCorporation +++
+++ "The Whole World is Watching" +++
Warning: Not for Amateurs
|