OSA: Acceptable Truths (was OSA)

In article <3p09ld$fbu@mars.earthlink.net> vera@earthlink.net "Vera Wallace" writes: >
> Come off it. He has a right to post as an inividual. I don't recall him
> denying he was a member of OSA. If he did, surely it was that he was
> not posting as an official position of the Church. Like I say, the
> official publications are what are printed and distributed or issued
> from the Church. Individual members, like in any organization have their
> own opinions. You, nor anyone else, can deny that right. If he says
> he is not posting from an official position of the Church, then fine.
So this is it. OSA can put anything out it likes on the net, but because Vera has defined the term "official publications" to mean "what are PRINTED and distributed and issued from the church," that makes the utterances of Andy Milne, which are only distributed and issued from the church, but not PRINTED, unofficial. After you've hung around a.r.s., you soon get a nose for the way these guys work. Acceptable truth is the name of the game. Let's make a FAQ on the acceptable truth. We've got enough examples from the OSA posters to make quite a respectable document by now. Volunteers?

-- Tony Sidaway SUPPORT DENNIS ERLICH, CRITIC SUED BY SCIENTOLOGISTS

Checks drawn in foreign currency on foreign banks ARE accepted. Send checks to Electronic Frontier Foundation, 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 801, Washington, DC 20006, USA. MAKE SURE YOU LABEL YOUR CHECK "DENNIS ERLICH DEFENSE FUND". Checks should be made out to Electronic Frontier Foundation. For verification of this info, email ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)