Re: More on Atack's duplicity

In article <3rag6c$arc@crl6.crl.com>, Andrew Milne <milne@crl.com> wrote: >It is fascinating to observe how some of the a.r.s. posters squirm
>It is fascinating to observe how some of the a.r.s. posters squirm >when the duplicity of one of their sources is exposed.
>when the duplicity of one of their sources is exposed. >
> Atack's personal actions and business dealings have little to do with his book's contents beyond a disputed paragraph. It has even less to do with his ulimate source, LRH's own papers and diaries which are teh most damaging source used by Atack and others. It is fascinating to see teh frantic hyperventilation of a known liar like Milne trying to sully Atack while all teh while doing more damage to himself and LRH and Co$ than Atack by being caught out in flimsy and obvious lies. Obviously, Atack sees himself in a crusade and has adopted the cult's own attitude towards business and th elaw. So since it is a draw there at worst, we have to get back to teh facts. Even though Atack seems quite arrogant, like Stupidology, his book still stands as a monument of truth in comparison to teh monument of lies erected by Stupidology and maintained to this day in such public works as What Is Scientology? and by teh cult's paid hack, liars and PR slimes. (That's you Andy).

Fact is, Atack for all his problems is still far more trustworthy as a source than Scientology or You, Andrew Milne for that matter.]

You are confused. You see, we have uncovered a pattern of lies and deceptions from LRH going back 50 years. He hardly ever told the truth. The cult has pretended his lies were not what they are and told many more to prop up LRH's whoppers. Lies on top of lies. Atack in comparison, has not the same problem. Very few purposefully told lies, if any, are to be found in A Piece Of Blue Sky, except those of LRH's or Scientology.

No matter how you dwell on Atack, or how much you wish to dirty his name, the above facts are still true and obvious. Attacking Atack as you do does not save LRH or Scientology from being exposed as liars. Using LRH's own manuscripts, diaries and other paper's saved from teh memory hole, the cult's shredder, by Armstrong, and used by Atack in his book. Your assault on Atack simply is not sufficient to remove the doubts about LRH or Stupidology. Or your own notable lack of honesty which is worse that Atack and makes you a poor commentator on this entire situation.

To reach you objective's you must disassemble each claim of Atack in his book, because each claim stands on it's own, destroying one claim of LRH's dishonesty for example, does not destroy them all. But you have so far, been able to impeach a single substaitive claim, only to expose your own dishonesty here on ARS as official spokeslime for your lie-cult.

You lose.

Sorry.

Pope Charles SubGenius Pope Of Houston Slack!