Re: Anits - A note to

Robert Marcus <102020.1551@CompuServe.COM> writes:

>Where are the solutions from the Antis regarding the problems of
>man? What the hell are they fighting for if not for a better
>world or for what they feel would be some benefit stemming from
>their so-called cause?
By telling people about how the Church of Scientology has behaved in the past we *are* doing something positive for the world. Fewer and fewer people will be deceived by this half-rate religion.

>I mean, there is this mad push to rid the world of Scientology.
>What do they propose in its absence? What is their vision of an
>ideal world?
I am quite certain that visions of utopia differ from user to user. But I for one do not expect ever to achieve such a vision, I merely strive towards it.

>Do they want freedom for man? Slavery? A world without
>criminality? A world of criminals? A-bomb warfare? One World
>Government? A Brave New World? WHAT?!?
You make the mistake of grouping everyone who dislikes Scientology into one group. I hardly think this is the case. This is probably one of the few areas will you will see conservatives and libertarians fighting side by side.

>Should mankind subscribe to one religion? No religion? Are
>they, in their meager attempts via a screwy Internet computer
>world with dummied up "documents", attempting world dominance or
>are actually thinking they are going to silence the greatest
>movement this planet has seen in over 2500 years?
>[Ranting deleted]
How about a religion of your own choice, unclouded by the lies that Scientology masquerades as "science"? I would doubt very seriously that anyone on this group wishes world dominance. Rather, they would hope the truth would come out about any organization that is based on lies and deception.

>Sexual love, as an example, would manifest itself as
>punishment with these fellows.
>[Deletia]
This one is too classic to delete. Sex is punishment for me because I disagree with Scientology? How interesting. I'm sure my finacee would have some words with you about that.

>[More ranting deleted.]
You know, my friend, I have come to the conclusion that you are not quite sane. This is hardly surprising, considering the source of your fanaticism, and in particular it's founder. To say such things as "All people who disagree with Scientlogy consider sex as punishment" is so idiotic as to border on the far fringes of reason. It is obvious to your audience here that you are doing and saying anything you can to malign those who would spread the truth. Such statements stopped carrying weight a long time ago.

-- "Freedom is meaningless unless | ic58@jove.acs.unt.edu - James Childers you can give to those with whom| No man's freedom is safe you disagree." - Jefferson | while Congress is in session EA 73 53 12 4E 08 27 6C 21 64 28 51 92 0E 7C F7