Re: Answers from Dan...

In article <3u4lf2$moe@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>, Dan Sigal <dynamicd@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

What I find interesting in the lack of statements by >the "antis" what their beliefs are.
Because it's not relevant to criticism of abuses of the CoS.

>Can anyone recall a sincere post
>what an anti's religious beliefs were?
I can't recall a sincere post from any current Scientologists giving any specifics about their religious beliefs. Ask any Christian and you will get detailed information about the gospel. Try to ask a Scientologist about any specifics. You just get banal generalities or worse, outright denial of things that are known to be in the OTIII levels (as revealed in court documents.)

>Nope. That would be a good
>forum, not to debate who is right (we are all right) but to show the
>differences in what or how we believe.
This aint no goddam tea party.

>Without asking,
In other words, you're talking out your ass.

>I can guarantee you that the Church attorneys
>thoroughly investigated/researched the copyright laws. [...]
>Those that dare to fight the Church and the copyrights, beware.
How sweet. What a nice church you belong, too. So concerned about my first amendment rights. So open to criticism and inquiry.

I reserve the right to quote appropriate portions of CoS documents for the purposes of criticism as is my right under the constitution and US copyright law.

Dave Cook