Woody pretends he is right was Re: ARS persecutors pretend they are right

In <noodleDAFMLu.HK3@netcom.com>, noodle@netcom.com (Rick Sherwood) writes: > This is a very basic trait with ARS persecutors. They
>pretend they are right. I say pretend because even they must have got the
>message by now that they are not going to be accepted as legitimate.

Is this why you refuse to give examples supporting your assertions ? At least most ARS people try to support their remarks with factual data:

such as:

"In addition to violating and abusing its own members' civil rights, the organization over the years with its "fair game" doctrine has harassed and abused those persons not in the church whom it perceives as enemies," -- LA Superior court judge Paul Breckenridge in a June 1984 ruling in the Gerry Armstrong case.

Fair game:

"A suppressive person becomes fair game. By fair game is meant may not be further protected by the codes and disciplines of Scientology...They cannot be granted the rights and beingness ordinarily accorded rational beings and so place themselves beyond any consideration for their feelings or well being...The homes, property, places, abodes of persons who have been active in attempting to suppress Scientology are all beyond the protection of Scientology ethics."

These policies have been continually used to frame, smear, or attempt to intimidate or blackmail "suppressive persons." Judges who had ruled against Scientology's position are an excellent example. These would including Judge Jones, Oregon, 1981; Judge Graae, U.S.D.C., 1976, Judge Brown, Cal. Sup. Ct., 1976, Judge Krentzman, U.S.D.C., Florida, 1976; Justice K. Skelly Wright, D.C., 1974, Judge Ritchey, D.C.D.C. 1979. (After reading evidence document #8592 below which clearly reveals the core heart and nature of the secret Scientology to get the specific details on Scientology's history of attacks on judges see the two newspaper articles "Prior Sect Try at Judge Reported," "Scientology's War Against Judges," the end of this section.)

The adversarial tactics of Scientology fall into three main types:

1.) Covert intelligence operations carried on at a professional level of sophistication near-comprable to a national security agency operation,

2.) A new evolution in outrageous courtroom tactics called "legal" brutality, and

3. ) Overt operations that could include propaganda programs and other overt attacks. These overt operations like the "legal brutality programs often are bases on a linkage to covert operation programs.

Covert intelligence operations cover the following general areas:

1.) Electronic eavesdropping and bugging.

2.) The creation of false identification and documents to aid in covert operations.

3.) The infiltration of organizations that are enemies of Scientology by obtaining jobs under false pretenses or identification.

4.) Impersonating a reporter to gain access as an operative and gain or plant information for Scientology.

5.) Breaking and entering into the attorney offices of a critic or enemy.

6.) Forced detention of an enemy or critic.

7.) Staging a fake hit and run auto accident involving a pedestrian

8.) Circulating false black PR stories.

9.) Framing critics for lewd sexual conduct.

10.) Framing a critic as being connected to organized crime.

11.) Burglary and theft.

12.) Attempting to get a person incarcerated in a mental institution.

13. ) Impersonating a person to frame or discredit them.

13.) Sending bomb threats and\or framing someone else for it.

14.) Confidential materials, disclosures, or confessions given to Scientology by members are routinely used to blackmail, silence, or intimidate that individual if that individual should leave Scientology and becomes critical of Scientology.

15.) Infiltrate the court system to alter and steal documents and files before, during or after court rulings. Possible Scientology involvement in conspiracies to commit murder or commit assaults

16) Possible Scientology involvement in conspiracies to commit murder or commit assaults

1.) Electronic eavesdropping and bugging. The FBI discovered that Scientology's intelligence operatives bugged IRS meetings where the cult's tax status was discussed. They discovered Scientology had detailed training manuals on exactly how to train its operatives on how to do this.

2.) The creation of false identification and documents to aid in covert operations. The FBI discovered that Scientology's intelligence operatives had made false IRS and Treasury department ID's to gain access to Scientology files kept in those agencies. Operatives normally do not just gather information but also remove information of evidence or plant false information designed to misdirect or incriminate the target. Scientology's intelligence operation can create or alter documents to manufacture false identification, false evidence, and false histories for itself and others. This false history practice is know in Scientology as doing a history rewrite by creating or altering documents to look like Scientology's new version of reality. History rewrite are most often performed on former members who file suits against Scientology or cooperate with the government.

Courts and agencies intended to protect society or victims of Scientology need to realize that if they are considered enemies of Scientology they are dealing with a professional intelligence agency. Appropriate security precautions must always be taken. All documents which Scientology submits must be verified in minute detail. One must always be wary that supposedly secure court files and evidence or your own internal files have been corrupted or altered by Scientology's operatives, moles, and double agents.

"In my opinion the church has one of the most effective intelligence operations in the U.S. rivaling even that of the F.B.I." From Ted Gunderson a former head of the F.B.I's Los Angeles office. (Time Magazine cover story of May 6, 1991.)

Remember that in 1979, nine of Scientology's top world executives pleaded guilty to extensive burglaries, forgeries, "infiltration," "obstruction of justice," and other crimes carried out against over 100 Federal agencies including the Dept. of Justice, The Dept. of Defense and the I.R.S.. If one realizes that Scientology runs a world class intelligence agency with a deep pocket budget and that agency does what every major intelligence agency does they would have an appropriate perspective. The following documents will shed more light on the sophistication of the Scientology intelligence machine.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[EVIDENCE FROM AUTHORIZED FBI SEARCH.]


                                                                                17 OCT 71
INT HATTING:
THE STRIKE


          A strike is the action of gathering information on a
          covert basis.  It is performed by one or more agents
          (persons doing the strike), who are intentionally aiming
          at a target (the desired info, or the person who has the
          target info, etc.).

          It is assumed that the individual is hatted as an INT
          agent.  The strike is done in 12 steps, and each step
          follows consecutively (thus, step 2 should not be begun
          until step 1 is completed, and any new observation
          pertaining to an earlier step during the doingness of a
          latter step requires reevaluation of the interim steps
          and verification of all the data acquired in the
          process).  The amount of time spent on a step and the
          amount of info needed for a respective step to be
          completed depends upon the target.  The objective is to
          get all of the target info, by whatever means is
          necessary.  For example, if the target is well-known and
          readily accessible to the agent (s), the strike may be
          achieved very quickly.  On the other hand, if the agent
          (s) knows very little about the target, has no current
          access to the target, and the target is a large quantity
          of data, it may take extensive research, planning, and
          on-target observation to begin the actual strike.  The
          quantity of knowledge needed to complete each step is
          relative to the circumstances of the target.  THE STEPS
          OF STRIKING 1) Receive the assignment to strike.  This
          usually comes in the form of an order from the agent's
          senior.  The senior may either officially order or
          unofficially suggest the strike, either way, the idea is
          given to the agent that the info must be covertly
          gathered from some source.  2) Take ownership of the job.
          Here the individual determines that he is going to be the
          one to do the strike.  3) Identify the target.  This may
          be knowing the name of a person or group on whom info
          must be covertly gathered, or it may be knowing the
          specific location of the piece of wanted data, or simply
          being told to "see what they are up to."  Either way, the
          purpose here is to have a starting basis for the strike.
          4) Gather info on the target area (the location of the
          target) for the purpose of striking.  This includes any
          info that would be pertinent to striking.  Info is
          pertinent to striking if it helps the agent to locate
          (pin-point) the specific target, gain access to the
          target area and the target, learn the routines of the
          target area, or anything else that would help to put the
          agent in control of the target during the strike itself.


INT CHGO                                        -2-                     17 OCT 71


          5) Determine the most optimum means available for gaining
          access to the target area, on the basis of the info now
          known about it.  This includes having a cover.  A cover
          is the pretense the agent assumes to make the strike
          possible.  It includes anything that protects the agent
          from exposure as the agent of the strike (e.g., assuming
          the cover of a newspaper man who wants to write an
          article on Scientology, with the objective of having the
          target group provide the agent with info on its
          activities as regards Scientology, but not know that this
          info will be used by Scientology itself).  The most
          optimum cover is one that excludes the agent from any
          suspicion by the target.  In some instances this would
          include wearing squeakless shoes, and carrying a large
          purse or attaché at all times so that the one time the
          agent is carrying target info in the purse or attaché, he
          is not questioned about its contents.


          6) Gain access to the target area.  This may include
          obtaining full-time employment from the target if the
          target is an organization, or simply contacting a person
          on a friendly basis so that the agent can gain access to
          personal files kept at home, or any other means that
          provides access to the target and a time span of access
          to the target that will allow the agent to gather all of
          the info that is wanted.  It is possible that the access
          to the data will require repeated strikes -- and thus,
          long-term procedures (e.g., full-time employment would
          allow long-term procedures and repeated strikes if the
          target were an organization).  This step may also be
          called penetration.


          7) Directly observe the target area for verification of
          the knowledge gained in the preceding steps and continue
          to gather new data that would be pertinent to striking.
          This includes determining the actual security measures
          used by the target area to keep the target safe.  (e.g.,
          guards making security rounds, locked cabinets,
          maintenance personnel after working hours, closed circuit
          TV cameras, alarm systems, etc.).  Three tools that are
          available to the agent (and have been tested and proved
          valuable in actual strike activity that required very
          strict security) include:


          #1 - SECURITY RULE OF THREE:  If the agent observes an
          activity in the target area occurring three separate
          times under identical or similar conditions within a
          given period of time (usually one week), he can use these
          observations in planning his striking activity.  One
          always observes for current and usual (predictable)
          activities in the target area, and accessible exits from
          the target area for "quick-get-away."


          #2 - SECURITY RADIUS:  a distance around the target that
          can be postulated as creating a safe condition for strike
          activity.  The radius may be used to listen for persons
          coming near the target area during strike- preparation
          and actual strike activity.  (e.g., if the strike
          requires that no one know that the agent has been in the
          target area, the agent should be able to hear someone
          enter his security radius and quickly leave the target
          area without being seen or heard by the intruder and
          without leaving evidence of his presence).


          #3 - If the target is extensive written material, it may
          be most optimum to have a separate location from the
          target area for reading and Xeroxing or transcribing the
          data -- this is called a SAFE READING PLACE.  If this is
          needed for strike activity, it should be determined
          during step 7 of striking procedures.


          The final aspect of step 7 is evaluation of all data
          obtained upon direct observation of the target area and
          re- evaluation of the data learned in the preceding six
          steps in light


          of the direct observation data.
          8) Determine how to safely get the target information
          from the target area to the person who wants the info.  (
          This would include making sure that the agent's cover is
          adequately planned (e.g., the big purse, etc.)


          9) Plan the actions, step by step, that will be necessary
          in doing the strike.  For instance, it may be found that
          the most optimum time to strike is between 12:30 PM and
          12:55 PM.  Thus the agent would plan to arrive at the
          target area at 12:31 PM; if the target area is safe (no
          persons present), he would then proceed to perform the
          strike, always listening to his security radius for
          intruders; he would proceed with operations until 12:50
          PM, making sure that he is out of the target area by
          12:52 PM.  This plan might include hitting the target,
          getting the info Xeroxed in the safe reading place, and
          returning the target info to its original location by
          12:50 PM.


          This step includes preparation for any unusual
          circumstances that might arise and how they would best be
          handled.  For instance, if someone entered the security
          radius of the above situation at 12:40 PM, would the
          agent leave the area immediately or wait for the person
          to leave the security radius?  The purpose of step 9 is
          to make sure that the agent has enough knowledge to
          perform the strike safely, accurately, and thoroughly.


          10) On the basis of the preceding steps, begin either a
          pretend dry-run of the strike (to check for unknowns and
          remedy them immediately) or do the actual strike,
          depending on the circumstances of the entire situation.






And on and on, the evidence is overwhelming.....




          And more and more ARS and the Internet are becoming COS's
          PR nightmare.




Pim van Meurs


 --- For more info pim@nepac.ucsd.edu ---