Re: More on Atack's duplicity

nsp@ten-fwd.airpcs.com (Neal Pendleton) wrote:

>In article <3rag6c$arc@crl6.crl.com>, Andrew Milne wrote:
>In article <3rag6c$arc@crl6.crl.com>, Andrew Milne <milne@crl.com> wrote: > [.article deleted...]
> [.article deleted...] >So instead of providing a useful piece of evidence for your claims,
>So instead of providing a useful piece of evidence for your claims, >which would be the full court transcripts, you spent your time typing
>which would be the full court transcripts, you spent your time typing >in an article from the church publication _Freedom_ (were you the
>in an article from the church publication _Freedom_ (were you the >author, Milne?).
>author, Milne?). >Why didn't you spend the energy to give us the transcript? It would
>Why didn't you spend the energy to give us the transcript? It would >have been infinitely more useful.
>have been infinitely more useful. >Why did you waste your time with this article?
>Why did you waste your time with this article?

>--

>--


>Neal

>Neal

Good question, Neal.   But Milne has given us a FANTASTIC OPPORTUNITY
TO DELVE INTO THE INNER WORKINGS OF THE CHURCH'S amazing litigation
engine and see what's at work!


Now, the church is currently engaged in a lawsuit against Dennis
Erlich which on its surface looks like pure harassment.  They claim
that Dennis posted copyrighted material on the internet - the same
internet one "Andrew Milne" subsequently posted his lengthy
reproduction of an article allegedly from the churchoid publication
"Freedom".


Gosh!  What a similarity!!!!


Now, at this point one either has to assume that:
1) The church doesn't care what gets copied, or doesn't suffer an
economic loss when such material is reprinted at no charge to the
reader, or both.  OR...
2) Andrew is an employee of the church but hasn't the decency to admit
it. OR...
3) The suit against Dennis is just uneven-handed harassment of the
church against a whistle-blower and the only evidence needed to prove
this is to show a docket which does not include "CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
v. ANDREW MILNE" as proof of it.


So Andrew, who IS your BOSS?