Re: Anits - A note to

On 19 Jul 1995, Robert Marcus wrote:

> Where are the solutions from the Antis regarding the problems of
> man? What the hell are they fighting for if not for a better
> world or for what they feel would be some benefit stemming from
> their so-called cause? One would think that would be something
> stated. Still haven't read a thing from any of the 20 or so Anti
> C of S Cultists. Since none has been offered, one must conclude
> that these are the acts of desparate men and women clutching to
> some dim hope of a battle long ago lost. Pity they think they
> are in the present. They are not. They know not of whom they
> perceive as their enemy, rather their true enemy is long gone,
> dissolved to dust and forever more.
>
<Robert adjusts the folds of his Generic-Holyman outfit>

Actually, Robert, we are concerned about you. We don't like the idea that you are being taken for a ride. We're fighting for *you*.

> I mean, there is this mad push to rid the world of Scientology.
No, there is a mad push for Scientology[tm] to be honest about itself.

> What do they propose in its absence? What is their vision of an
> ideal world?
>
Freedom of speech, freedom of religion. Got a problem with that?

> Do they want freedom for man? Slavery? A world without
> criminality? A world of criminals? A-bomb warfare? One World
> Government? A Brave New World? WHAT?!?
>
are we on the same page here, Robert?

> Should mankind subscribe to one religion? No religion?
These are not questions being addressed on a.r.s. at this time except by you.

Are > they, in their meager attempts via a screwy Internet computer
> world with dummied up "documents",
Show me one instance where an anti has dummied up a document. Chris Miller, on the other hand, dummied up a police report that s/he had no reason having in the first place. Other scienos that have posted here in the past give misinformation by quoting partial texts and palying semantic and contextual games.

attempting world dominance or > are actually thinking they are going to silence the greatest
> movement this planet has seen in over 2500 years? Absurd. Yet
> they continue to dupe themselves with their delusion of power.
This is not about "power" to anyone but you. THERE IS NO ENEMY. Can you confront that?

> The cannot act, though they believe they can. All is delusion
> for us who observe them. Maybe they feel that their 20 or so
> could win a fist fight against the 8 million.
There's that undocumented 8 million figure again. We've shown over and over again that there are only probably about 50,000 sicentologists[tm] worldwide.

THis is an example of a semantic game. You got the 8 million figure by claiming everyone who's ever bought a copy of Dianetics is a Scientologist[tm]. Your statistics are faulty not just because not everyone who reads Dianetics becomes a scientologist; but the practice of Scientologists[tm] purchasing the book in bulk and redistributing for further sale has inflated your base, making it unusable for the purpose you try to use it for satistically. Is this aan example of Hubbard[tm] study tech?

The reality of > their power is all two dimensional, digital babble amongst
> themselves with an electric, telephone and lawyer bills at the
> end of the month, with a tremendous hatred eating away their very
> existence more and more and more with every passing moment they
> engage in their losing battle -- their every attention unit stuck
> solidly for literally no other activity to share the remaining
> space or time within their universes. This is what will kill
> them dead. My God, how utterly trapped they are.
I don't hate you, or any scientologist. Can you confront that? I have a full life outside a.r.s. Do you? I care about you, this is why I post here. I don't want to see you hurt when they have no further use for you.

>
> Now, are they in favor of prayer in public schools? What would
> they do then? Are they Christian Fundamentalists?
Now what on earth does that have to do with the actions of the Scientology[tm] organization[s]?

Or just > mentalists? Do they have any faith at all, other than something
> on the order of "We have faith that Scientology will vanish" or
> some such quip. All too predictable. It is tragic that there is
> such a vast void in the very fabric of their soul and certainly
> no real peace. They are the truly ill of planet earth,
> physically and mentally. They honor no god, no morals as they
> are incapable. Friends, they hate love. They "love to hate".
> But they actually hate themselves contrary to any utterance to
> the contrary. If only they could take an honest look at their
> existence. They cannot.
>
LRH said something about those who speak in generalities. Can you quote it for me, Robert [if you're allowed]?

> It appears rather odd the onslaught against some, in their
> opinion, threat, yet there seems to be no actual cause or benefit
> involved, at least for the masses. Apparently it is just a very
> small mob looking to victory but only for themselves.
There is no victory if there is no enemy. I am not trying to hurt you or your belief system. I am merely questioning the actions of an organization to which you claim to belong. I don't think that merits this kind of diatribe; I'd ask the same questions of any organization that has so many people all over the world who don't even know each other so angry at it!

Very tiny > beings creating a very small effect. Ah, but let them delusion
> on. They are beyond repair. Their love lost for all eternity.
> This is their trade off. And without love, they are dead. Any
> love they professes is a pretense. They cannot experience real
> love. Sexual love, as an example, would manifest itself as
> punishment with these fellows. Pity their families and loved
> ones. Reminds me of the movie Superman in which the three
> criminals were placed in a two dimensional rectangle and sent off
> into the depths of the universe for all eternity as their
> punishment. The difference is that these folks will be confined
> to the two dimensional universe of cyber space for all eternity.
> However, as I stated earlier, to the degree one hates is to the
> degree one must have loved in the first place. There is the
> possibility that one who reads this will make a change in their
> life. There is always hope for that one. The door is always
> opened if even but a crack.
>
>
that's right, Rpobert. When you're done thinking that we're all out to get you, maybe we can talk.

--------------------------------------m. council, human being

Hell, if you understood
everything I say, you'd              council@luna.cas.usf.edu
be me.     -Miles Davis
-------------------------------------------------------------