Dennis Erlich - SP Leader

modemac@netcom.com (Modemac)

>You see, the "church" of Scientology is convinced that Dennis Erlich is
>the one "in charge" of the squirrels, SPs, and "persecutors" here on
>alt.religion.scientology.
Are you saying I'm *not*????

>They believe that he is the one sending out
>orders, and that we are obeying his commands.
(BTW, I ordered Modemac to write this. He did a good job, no?) >Notice how Wonderclam declared that Dennis has "formed a cult" here on
>alt.religion.scientology. Notice how Robert Marcus keeps referring to
>Dennis Erlich by name, only rarely mentioning anyone else here by name -
>except for Diane Richardson, who is a close friend of Dennis.
He also mention my dog ... er ... but I actually think he was talking about the ars readers. <no offense> >Pope Charles posted Helena Kobrin's latest threatening letter, in which
>Kobrin pointed out that there was a restraining order against Dennis, AND
>against all persons "employed" by Dennis Erlich or otherwise under his
>command. This means that not only is Dennis prohibitied from mentioning
>the so-called "sacred scripture" of Scientology here, but everyone in
>Dennis' "cult" is likewise forbidden.
This was covered in ARS URGENT DIRECTIVE - 18 Jul 1995 - CONSPIRACIES, CONCEALMENT OF. You all should have a copy by now. >The "church" of Scientology believes that the restraining order against
>Dennis applies to all of us as well, because we are all "under his
>command." That's why Kobrin pointed out the restraining order to Pope
>Charles, even though Dennis' name has never been mentioned in the
>discussion of the OT VII materials.
Oat Tea 7 was not on my restricted list from the court. I can post it to my heart's content. Only I don't have a copy. It was not one of the documents I either posted originally or verified as authentic. >There's only one problem with this: there is no proof. They can't prove
>that we are all under Dennis command, and until they find some proof there
>is NOTHING they can do to keep us from quoting their "trade secrets" and
>"sacred scriptures" under the terms of Fair Use.
I'm gonna tell them you're all my slaves. <that's what I tell myself> >What's more, they never WILL prove it.
They won't have to. I admit it.

>Of course, WE all know why they
>can't prove that we are under Dennis Erlich's command.
<shush! it's all covered in the Directive above>

>But they will
>never understand - not until they WAKE UP and stop thinking the way
>Hubbard wanted the world to think!
>
>I therefore make this statement to Helena Kobrin, Warren McShane, and any
>other OSA goons monitoring this newsgroup:
>
>YOU WILL NEVER PROVE THAT I AM EMPLOYED BY OR UNDER THE COMMAND OF DENNIS
>ERLICH. NEITHER I, NOR ANYONE ELSE HERE.
How about if I show them the payroll stubs? >You can harass me, you can investigate me, you can do whatever you want.
>
>YOU WILL NEVER PROVE IT.
>
>And we are going to CONTINUE using Fair Use to discuss your so-called
>"trade secrets." You will NEVER stop us from doing so. We are going to
>CONTINUE spreading the TRUTH about the dangerous cult known as
>Scientology to the world. You CAN'T stop us. You will NEVER stop us.
>
>NEVER.
Take *that* to the bank. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"