About the hearing fri

rnewman@MIT.EDU

I wrote: >The motions include:
>
>[from the scienos]
>
> 2) Motion for sanctions against Carla Oakley of MoFo for
> including LA Times, St. Pete Times, Forbes Mag, et. al.,
> articles describing the OT3 Wall-o-fire, in one of her
> unsealed filings.
Ron: >On what grounds do the Scientologists seek sanctions against
>Carla Oakley for entering published news articles into the
>court record? I don't understand this one at all.
On the grounds of Diminished Capacity. > Attornies expected: Ableson, Small, Moxon, Kobrin, et. al.
>
>Who is Ableson? Haven't seen that name before.
Check the transcript of the first hearing. He jumped in and dribbled all over his tie, I believe. He's Wilson's partner. Wilson, I forgot. It's so easy. >Which attorneys and law firms are representing RTC, and which ones
>are representing Bridge Publications?
Where does one corporation end and the next begin in the scieno cult? >Will there be any motions regarding the "Chris Miller" affair,
>where s/he claims to have a daughter working for MoFo?
<chuckle> It has absolutely no relevance to what's before the court. It may be the subject of other suits I intend to bring. Besides, Miller is a liar, a guy, a shared account and the security on my case at MoFo is very tight. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"