Erlich Case Documents part 2 of 3

EXHIBIT A DOCUMENTS DOCUMENT DEFECTS

1. HCOPL 25 Feb. 1966, * No right to renewal ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY period after Dec. 31, 1994.

* No automatic presumption of validity due to (1) lack of renewal registration, and (2) more than 5 years before registration.

2. HCO PL 23 DEC. 1965, * No automatic presumption ETHICS, SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, of validity due to SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, (1) lack of renewal SUPPRESSION OF registration, and SCIENTOLOGY AND (2) more than 5 years SCIENTOLOGISTS, THE FAIR before registration. GAME LAW * No presumption as to corrected information.

* Title discrepancy.

* No presumption as to corrected information in supplement.

* No presumption since in renewal term and no renewal registration.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

3. LRH ED 149 PROJECT * Title discrepancy. SQUIRREL * No registration for underlying work sued upon.

* Claim in footnote 1 to Exh. A that this work is confidential is inconsistent with the certificate, which shows work was published and two copies deposited.

4. 20 Nov. 1961, ROUTINE * Copyright expired; work 3D COMMANDS in public domain.

* Title discrepancy.

* No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

5. HCO PL 1 JULY 1965 * No right to renewal ETHICS CHITS period after Dec. 31, 1993.

* Title discrepancy.

* No automatic presumption of validity due to (1) lack of renewal registration, and (2) more than 5 years before registration.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

2

6. HCO B 22 MARCH 1967, * No right to renewal ALTER-IS AND DEGRADED period after Dec. 31, BEINGS 1995.

* Title discrepancy.

* No automatic presumption of validity due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

7. HCO PL 1 May 1965 STAFF * No right to renewal MEMBER REPORTS period after Dec. 31, 1993.

* No automatic presumption of validity due to (1) lack of renewal registration, and (2) more than 5 years before registration.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* Title discrepancy.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

8. HCO PL 6 December 1976 * Title discrepancy. ILLEGAL PCS, ACCEPTANCE OF * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

9. HCOB 10 September 1983 * Title discrepancy. PTSNESS AND DISCONNECTION * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

10. HCOB 6 May 1982 I THE * Title discrepancy. CAUSE OF CRIME 8 No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

8 No registration for underlying work sued upon.

EXHIBIT B DOCUMENTS

DOCUMENT DEFECTS

1. CLASS VIII "ASSISTS" TAPE No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

2. NOTS ISSUE 24 "NOTS * No registration for CORRECTION LIST" underlying work sued upon.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* Title discrepancy.

* No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate.

3. OT1 * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

4. OT2 * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration.

* No registration for underlying work sued upon.

5. NOTS Issue 34 * No registration for underlying work sued upon.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* Title discrepancy.

* No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate.

6. NOTS Issue 35 * No registration for underlying work sued upon.

* Title discrepancy.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate.

7. NOTS Issue 36 * No registration for underlying work sued upon.

* Title discrepancy.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate.

8. NOTS Issue 1 * No registration for underlying work sued upon.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* Title discrepancy.

* No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate.

9. NOTS Issue 42 * No registration for underlying work sued upon.

* No presumption as to corrected information.

* Title discrepancy.---

* No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate.

CSMGMT U.S. District Court U.S. District for the Northern District of California (San Jose)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 95-CV-20091

Religious Technology, et al v. Netcom On-Line Comm., et al Filed: <a href="02/08/95">02/08/95</a> Assigned to: Judge Ronald M. Whyte Jury demand: Defendant Referred to: Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 820 Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, a Andrew H. Wilson California non-profit (COR LD NTC] corporation Wilson Ryan Blum & Campilongo Plaintiff 235 Montgomery St Ste 450 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 39 1 - 3 9 0 0

Kendrick L. Moxon [COR LD NTC] Bowles & Moxon 6255 Sunset Blvd Ste 2000 Los Angeles, CA 90028 (213) 661-4030

Thomas M. Small [COR LD NTC] Small Larkin Kidde & Golant 10940 Wilshire Blvd Ste 400 Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310) 209-4400

Helena K. Kobrin [COR LD NTC] 7629 Fulton Avenue North Hollywood, CA 91605 (213) 960-1933

Elliot J. Abelson [COR LD NTC] 2121 Avenue of the Stars Twenty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-5010 310-282-8975

BRIDGE PUBLICATIONS, INC., a Andrew H. Wilson California non-profit (See above) corporation [COR LD NTC]

---------

end of part 2 of
looks like 4 now, sorry...
---------