Re: Sterling management sBy tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr)Tue, 04 Jul 1995 18:40:35 GMT dennis.l.erlich@support.com wrote:
> In Sterling v Cult Awareness Network, a Glendale judge ruled
[schnip] Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: p.d.coates@support.com Subject: SMS vs CAN et al Date: Sun, 05 Feb 95 00:29:19 -0800
Emery Wilson Corporation, dba Sterling Management Systems, filed suit against Cult Awareness Network, Cynthia Kisser and Priscilla Coates in December 1991, BC043028, The Emery Wilson Corp vs Cult Awareness Network. The Honorable Aviva K. Bobb, Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, handed down a ruling on January 31, 1995: The court now rules as follows: Plaintiff's Motion to strike the answer of defendants, Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser, filed May 2, 1994 is denied. Plaintiff's motion in the alternative for issue sanctions against the Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser is granted. The court finds that defendants, Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser misused the discovery process by failing to respond to the authorized method of discovery, and disobeying a court order to provide discovery. Defendants destroyed numerous phone logs, and defendant Cult Awareness Network's mail logs "disappeared" without explanation by defendants. These logs were properly responsive to plaintiff's discovery requests and the court order of November 3, 1993. Therefore, pursuant to section 2023(b)(2), Code of Civil Procedure, the court imposes the following sanction against defendants Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser: 1. Defendants, Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser, are prohibited from presenting any evidence at trial to oppose the claim that defendants, Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser, interfered with plaintiff's clients and prospective clients. 2. Defendants, Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser, are prohibited from presenting any evidence at trial to support the claim that they received complaints about plaintiff's practices. Monetary sanctions are denied. Defendants' Motion for sanctions, filed September 19, 1994, is granted. The court finds that the plaintiff misused the discovery process by failing to respond to an authorized method of discovery, and disobeying a court order to provide discovery. In June, 1994, numerous documents were retrived [sic] from plaintiff's trash bin which were properly responsive to defendants' previous discovery requests and the March 23, 1994 court order. Therefore, pursuant to section 2023(b)(2), Code of Civil Procedure, the court imposes the following sanctions against the plaintiff: 1. The documents found in plaintiff's trash bin, and attached to the Priscilla Coates declaration of July 26, 1994, are deemed authenticated. 2. Plaintiff is prohibited from presenting any evidence at trial to support its claim that defendants interfered with plaintiff's clients and prospective clients. 3. Plaintiff is prohibited from presenting any evidence at trial to support its claims that plaintiff does not recruit for the Church of Scientology and is not financially connected to the Church of Scientology. 4. Plaintiff is prohibited from presenting evidence at trial to support the claim that plaintiff has not done business as a branch office of the World Institute of Scientology Enterprises. Monetary sanctions are denied.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: Sms vs can et al Date: Sun, 05 Feb 95 22:03:00 -0800
* For Readers who don't speak legal * +---------------------------------+ My comments in brackets []
> Emery Wilson Corporation, dba Sterling Management
>The court now rules as follows:
> 1. Defendants, Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser,
> 2. Defendants, Cult Awareness Network and Cynthia Kisser,
> Monetary sanctions are denied.
>The court finds that the plaintiff [Sterling] misused the discovery process
> 1. The documents found in plaintiff's trash bin, and
> 2. Plaintiff is prohibited from presenting any evidence
> 3. Plaintiff is prohibited from presenting any evidence
> 4. Plaintiff is prohibited from presenting evidence at
> Monetary sanctions are denied.
Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * <dennis.l.erlich@support.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: Deeny3@aol.com (Deeny3) Subject: Re: Boycott Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 17:54:23 +0000
Duck98@aol.com says:
> FYI - Sterling Management was owned by Greg (last name forgotten) the
_Deirdre
--- Tilman Hausherr [Awards: KoX, DB, Koos "seal of approval"] biz: tilman@sietec.de <a href="http://www.sietec.de/">http://www.sietec.de/</a>(company page) home: tilman@berlin.snafu.de <a href="http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/">http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/</a> | |||