RI-ACT-82 Scientology vs Sex with Animals and Masturbating
By Koos Nolst Trenite
17 May 1995 23:26:25 +0100
17 May 1995
RI-ACT-82 'Scientology vs Sex with Animals and Masturbating'
Message #82 for Alt.Clearing.Technology on Internet
from Ron's Inspector
Tony Sidaway just "posted" my
RI-83i 'The Right to Study and Apply Scientology
Can Never Be Denied' of 16 June 1994,
and substituted the words "applying Scientology"
with "fondling Panties".
(I stated the truth
that studying and applying Scientology
are quite comparable
to learning to read and write, a few centuries ago)
But for Sidaway
'sexual restimulation' and 'Scientology'
are,
in his thoughts, in his view of the world, his universe,
more or less the same thing.
There is, for him,
with all due respect
to his abilities to sexually restimulate others,
not too much difference
between 'sexual restimulation' and 'Scientology'.
This gives you a clue also
as to why he posts on alt.religion.scientology.
And this gives you some idea
of what he actually is posting about -
WHAT HE POSTS ABOUT ON A.R.S.
HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO
WITH THE SUBJECT OF SCIENTOLOGY - NOT AT ALL.
In fact,
he does not have the faintest idea what Scientology is,
and that's why he is writing an enormous volume of
words and sentences on a.r.s., daily,
which are very vacuous (void, empty) of actual Scientology.
The things people have Scientology confused with
are quite quite amazing.
I said
"Studying and applying Scientology
is comparable to the ability to read and write",
and he can't confront that,
but he CAN confront
'fondling panties' for sexual restimulation.
That's about as high as Tony Sidaway has risen
on the subject of philosophy.
And that IS his philosophy, apparently,
with all due respect to him.
To him, Scientology has NOTHING to do
with studying life,
with understanding life,
with improving life.
These are things one does not necessarily know
about someone
who pretends to write such a huge amount
of articles and responses on "Scientology".
He isn't talking, writing about SCIENTOLOGY at all!
Next guy also posts today, Stark at prostar.com,
he "posts" an article of mine, a session report,
and he substitutes
the person being audited,
with a dog, a pet animal,
which says "woof" and so on.
It isn't even funny.
It is ridiculing people
who are interested
in becoming more able, more aware,
in increasing their understanding of self and others.
So the highest reality
that this character Stark is capable of,
is that people who want to improve themselves,
are dogs,
are like
whatever his concept is of a pet animal.
That's Mr. Stark's personal reality,
- in his mind, in his universe -
of Scientology-auditing.
And I am not intending this
satirically or as a joke,
not at all,
also not about Tony Sidaway.
Now we already have sex and animals,
- I substitute 'and' for 'with', for rhetorical reasons -
so I have satisfied the first part
of the subject-title of this RI-ACT-82.
The rest is about Flemming Funch.
His reality on truth is 'masturbation', male masturbation.
Apparently,
when he considers a male person is communicating truth to him,
he is receiving communication about masturbation.
This, for Funch, apparently is a sign
that a male person is telling him the truth.
I posted and post truth (if you are willing to accept it)
to the clear-l list,
to which Funch is a subscriber - I don't know why,
probably he thinks it a good way of getting admiration -
and Funch of course receives, via clear-l, the truth I post.
And he posted on 26 April 1995
that to him this is 'masturbation in his mailbox'.
Maybe it's funny, tastes are differing,
but would YOU get the idea
to call anything that you receive in your mailbox,
- whether from a list or private, -
to call it masturbation?
To be very honest, I would not,
and I think most of you would not get such an idea,
because one must be pretty degraded,
actually on the Tone level of Sex,
which is below Zero, it's a subzero Tone level, 'Sex'.
(Maybe this is why he ran away from the subject of Scientology
and returned to psychology - there is more sex in psychology.)
To quote Funch correctly, he posted
"jerking off in his mailbox",
and I am informed that this is the vulgar term
- probably appreciated by Jane Staller, I don't know
(she recently posted that she 'has a cunt',
a vulgar word for the female sexual organ)-
[the vulgar term] for a male body stimulating itself sexually
to the point of ejaculation of semen.
It is interesting to note
that Funch takes only female 'clients' for his 'therapy',
and this is apparently so
that he does not have to hear them speak the unconfrontable,
the what he reactively calls 'truth',
which would be when a male person
tells him about his "jerking off".
This is on the subject of Funch receiving, via clear-l,
truth into his mailbox,
and him calling that
the semen produced
by sexual self-restimulation of male bodies.
Now the FUNNY part of this,
I believe is,
that he is STILL
trying to get it out of his mailbox, every day,
by returning the mail he gets via clear-l, every day,
as was suggested to him
by the very psychotic Mick Wallchofsky, on 23 Apr 1995.
FUNCH, LIKE A LITTLE CLEANING WOMAN,
every day tries to CLEAN HIS MAILBOX FROM THE TRUTH
by sending it back (by returning it).
A bit crazy, don't you agree?
But FUNNY !!
When I have figured out how to upload big files,
I will send a copy of the whole lot
to Funch's system administrator, with this letter,
and then this person can also have a laugh on Funch's expense!
So now we have the last part of the subject-title
of this RI-ACT-82,
and that completes the communication.
The masturbating Funch,
the dog-patting Stark,
the panty-fondling Sidaway,
letting us all know that this, to their mind,
is identical with, or similar to
'Scientology', which IS truth.
I hope I have provided some examples
of the 'think' and the manners, and the language,
of some who post here.
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector
Copyright 1995 by Koos Nolst Trenite
reference:
RI-50R-Li 'Archives of RI-xxi and RI-ACT-xx series'
of 28 Dec 1994, Revised and Replaced 2 May 1995
|