Re: Andy's deviousness - how many lies has he told?

milne@crl.com (Andrew Milne) wrote:

>R Agent (rogue@ccs.neu.edu) wrote:
>R Agent (rogue@ccs.neu.edu) wrote: >: an honest picture. You blatantly lied about the Chicago Trib and the
>: an honest picture. You blatantly lied about the Chicago Trib and the >: LA Times; I fully expect an apology for that lie, and an explanation,
>: LA Times; I fully expect an apology for that lie, and an explanation, >I have never lied in this forum. In the case of the Chicago Tribune, I
>I have never lied in this forum. In the case of the Chicago Tribune, I >made a mistake because I did not have the documents -- or notes taken
>made a mistake because I did not have the documents -- or notes taken >from them -- beside me when I was posting, as I usually do. I
>from them -- beside me when I was posting, as I usually do. I >misremembered the article as stating that the series itself was a joke,
>misremembered the article as stating that the series itself was a joke, >when in fact it was the LA Times investigation that was cited as an
>when in fact it was the LA Times investigation that was cited as an >office joke in the paper itself.
>office joke in the paper itself. ... because it did not kick the ass of the church enough, in the opinion of the Chicago Tribune.

>I try to be accurate in my posts.
>I try to be accurate in my posts. Flunk ! Flunk ! Flunk !

>If I do make an error, I correct it. This will continue.
>If I do make an error, I correct it. This will continue. Ask the cancel poodle to cancel all your previous posts about the "office joke". Many of us told you that they didn't believe you; instead of checking your material, you stood firm.

>Of course, I do not post everything on a subject; that
>Of course, I do not post everything on a subject; that >would be inappropriate and time alone would prevent it.
>would be inappropriate and time alone would prevent it. Or could show a very different picture.

>If my Tribune posting caused confusion to anybody, I apologize for that.
>If my Tribune posting caused confusion to anybody, I apologize for that. Your apology is bogus, does not even get the "seal of acceptable truth". You have lied a lot in this forum. What about that success that you posted before it happened ? What about DAing Fishman, Tabayoyon, S&V Young ? What about you attempt to make us believe that Atack may no longer distribute "Blue Sky" ? What about all those lies that Commodore and Tony Sideway took apart ?

I am sure that if a newbie scientologist asks about the LA Times article, you will tell him the same you told us. Too bad that on a.r.s., lies are debunked quite fast.

We really need that Andrew Milne debunked allegations FAQ.

--- Tilman Hausherr          [KoX, 1.9, DB]

biz:  tilman@sietec.de                 <a href="http://www.sietec.de/">http://www.sietec.de/</a>(company page)
home: tilman@berlin.snafu.de           <a href="http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/">http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/</a>


  Praise Xenu, Mozilla and "Bob"!  (and say "Hi" to Warren McShane !)