Re: pro-women law firm not so pro-women

Chris Miller <cmiller@lightside.com> wrote:

>I have been reading with great interest articles which acknowledge
>I have been reading with great interest articles which acknowledge >American businesses with policies which assist women in the workplace.
>American businesses with policies which assist women in the workplace. >As a working mother, I am always on the lookout for such businesses and
>As a working mother, I am always on the lookout for such businesses and >for any cause which supports working women (especially single mothers).
>for any cause which supports working women (especially single mothers). >One leader in this field is the lawfirm of Morrison & Foerster and I was
>One leader in this field is the lawfirm of Morrison & Foerster and I was >thrilled when my daughter landed a job there. Morrison & Foerster has
>thrilled when my daughter landed a job there. Morrison & Foerster has >been validated for its pro bono work involving women's rights by Working
>been validated for its pro bono work involving women's rights by Working >Mother Magazine, the Bay Area chapter of Women in Communication Inc, the
>Mother Magazine, the Bay Area chapter of Women in Communication Inc, the >Alliance for Children's Rights, and other groups. I have heard however
>Alliance for Children's Rights, and other groups. I have heard however >that this stance is more window dressing than truth and that some of
>that this stance is more window dressing than truth and that some of >their clients are actually abusers of women and children.
>their clients are actually abusers of women and children. >I'm told they are doing pro-bono representation of a high
>I'm told they are doing pro-bono representation of a high >publicity case involving a deadbeat father 9 years in arrears on child
>publicity case involving a deadbeat father 9 years in arrears on child >support with a history of wife-beating. It makes me wonder if the pro
>support with a history of wife-beating. It makes me wonder if the pro >bono work in support of women and children is actually self-serving and
>bono work in support of women and children is actually self-serving and >whether they really deserve their awards. Does anyone have any
>whether they really deserve their awards. Does anyone have any >information in this regard?
>information in this regard? Yes, let me help you. My information is that:

- the name of client of the mighty MoFo is Dennis Erlich, who was a high-ranking member of the cult of scientology until 1982,

- that the person posting as "Chris Miller" is a scientologist, or someone working for scientology,

- that scientology is very upset that there is a steadily growing defense fund for Dennis: people are willing to pay to support him,

- that your posting style is amazingly similar to "Vera Wallace", a former poster on alt.religion.scientology, who is suspected of being "Helena Kobrin", attorney for plaintiff, or "Eugene Ingram", private investigator for plaintiff, for which an arrest warrant has been issued,

- that Vera/you had to drop her/your Earthlink account because she/you revealed the real name of a woman (TarlaStar), and have never told how her/you got her name. TarlaStar was very upset, because she had choosen to keep her real name off the net, because she didn't want to be harassed by immature men on the net,

- that you accused Modemac of dealing with child pornography,

- that scientology has a record of child neglect and abuse (as documented by Dennis Erlich, the St. Petersburg Times, Tonya Burden, Julie Christofferson, Yolanda Howell, and many more) and as well as coerced abortions (as documented by Mary Tabayoyon),

- that Dennis Erlich was kidnapped by scientology in 1978 and locked into a basement for 14 days,

- that Dennis Erlich is currently involved as defendant in three lawsuits (including the child-support lawsuit), all connected to the cult of scientology, whose purpose is to ruin and destroy him (to do so with critics is *official policy* !!),

- the allegation "abuser of women and children" have been discussed on a.r.s. already, and I do not want to spread this out again. Dennis has answered those questions to our satisfaction, and although I do not know him personally, I am persuaded that Dennis is a wonderful dad (he has four daughters) and a caring person since he is out of the cult, a cult who destroys people. The dispute between he and his ex-wife was quiet for seven 7 years, although his wife did always know where to reach him, and came only up after he was sued by the cult,

- that sending a spy into a opposite lawfirm is probably a felony.

Read alt.religion.scientology to find out more, or e-mail me for documents on the different allegations I have made.

Tilman Hausherr SUPPORT DENNIS ERLICH, CRITIC SUED BY SCIENTOLOGISTS EFF STILL SUPPORTS DENNIS; FUND IS NOW RUN BY LAW FIRM. "An important test case for the Net"-Shari Steele, for EFF, to the BBC.

COPY THIS NOTICE INTO YOUR SIG! For the poop: <a href="http://www.mit.edu:8001/people/rnewman/scientology/home.html">http://www.mit.edu:8001/people/rnewman/scientology/home.html</a><a href="http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/">http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/</a>

Checks drawn in foreign currency on foreign banks ARE accepted. Send checks to MORRISON & FOERSTER, 345 California Street, San Francisco, California 94104-2675. Telephone: (415) 677-7000 Fax: (415) 677-7522 Contact People: Carla Oakley and Katie Walsh. MAKE SURE YOU LABEL YOUR CHECK "DENNIS ERLICH DEFENSE FUND". Checks should be made out to Morrison & Foerster. For verification of this info, email ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele) [This .sig stolen from Tony Sideway !]