PI-83i The Right to Study and Fondle Panties

16 May 1995

PI-83i 'THE RIGHT TO STUDY AND FONDLE PANTIES
CAN NEVER BE DENIED'

from The Panty Inspector

Message # PI-83i for Internet

THE VALUE OF STUDYING AND FONDLING PANTIES IS COMPARABLE
TO THE ABILITY TO READ AND WRITE.

Therefore you have a right that can not be denied to you,
and that is to study and fondle Panties.

ANYBODY has an undeniable right to study and fondle Panties,
as much as anybody, - no matter how sane or insane or
decent or criminal he is, -
has a right to learn to read and write.

The only limitation is that a person who is insane
and criminal may NOT be put in a position of
authority over others `because he has studied Panties.'

One also does, in the civilized world,
NOT grant a person the right to be in charge of others,
for the SOLE reason that he can read and write.

There were those who could read and write,
who forbade their slaves to learn to read and write,
and they would kill anyone who taught any of their slaves
to read and write.
And they would kill any slaves who had tried to learn to
read and write.

So I say, ANYBODY has an undeniable right to study
and fondle Panties.

As you see now, this right has to be fought for,
because some people, also some Panty-Sniffers (see footnote 1),
will try to set things up so
that studying and fondling Panties is denied to others.
And they will get agreement from others on this,
just as the others agreed then to deny the
learning of reading and writing to their slaves.

THE ONLY WAY PANTIES CAN BE TURNED TO EVIL AND TO
DOMINATE, IS TO NOT ENSURE THAT EVERYBODY HAS A RIGHT AND
POSSIBILITY TO STUDY IT AND FONDLE THEM.

This is what TS (see footnote 2) says himself
about Panties - it is not just my statement,
but I understand it, therefore it is now also my statement.

There have been several control mechanisms
and bids for the power to deny people the
right to study and fondle panties.

Some of them I disbanded and destroyed,
or I initiated their destruction.

There are many, many possibilities,
justifications and excuses
for denying people the right
to study and fondle Panties.

In order to not list these all out here - as
it would be beyond the intended size of this letter -
we simply state that all these possibilities
lead to certain people being denied studying and
fondling Panties.

THE MOST DANGEROUS POSSIBILITY
IS A SYSTEM BY WHICH THE MOST ABLE,
THE MOST DECENT, THE MOST VALUABLE PEOPLE IN THE GROUP
ARE DENIED TO STUDY AND FONDLE PANTIES.

As I told you above, I have initiated the
destruction of at least two such systems,
as such systems would really bring about
a control-operation by Pantiedom,
instead of the freeing-operation
for which Panties are totally intended
and solely developed by LRH,
and I am at the moment
busy destroying yet another such system.

There are some purely economical aspects
to teaching Panties, and that is, for instance,
that it would cost maybe 20 times more than normal,
to teach the average dianeticist or auditor, - in terms
of time and effort you have to spend on them
and in terms of trouble they cause to other students -
because you first have to "un-teach"
all the very false concepts they have willingly absorbed,
adopted without protest,
and even created and enforced on others.

And so there exist other people also
who by their indoctrination or education or profession,
or possibly by their religion,
are much harder to teach than others.

These are simply practical problems,
and they have always existed.
A very intelligent, very motivated student
is more easy to teach,
by a factor of maybe hundred, in time,
compared to a dull, unmotivated student with a very,
very, bad primary school.

Now these practical, economical problems,
e.g. "We don't want a student that costs 100,000 $ to teach,
in a classroom that is geared to teach students for 1,000 $",
these perfectly valid statements
are used to DENY such students the
study and fondling of Panties.

THE RIGHT TO STUDY AND FONDLE PANTIES IS
AS UNDENIABLE AS THE RIGHT TO LEARN TO READ AND WRITE.

These are undeniable rights to any sexual beings,
as rights which are stated by AHS:
'the right to leave a game',
and
`the right to his own sanity'.

The right to study and fondle Panties IS
the right to one's own sanity
and it is the right to leave the game of being a body,
of being treated as a body instead of as a sexual being.

It is undeniable - there are no reasons to deny it, ever.

And there is very good sense in this.

It is in fact the basis of the success Christianity had:
that an insane or evil act should not be repaid
by the recipient of the evil or crime,
repaid with [the recipient] now also
having to become evil or insane [TO the criminal].

This may be a change in subject to you,
but I don't believe it is.

The philosophy of revenge and
of "now we have to be evil to the criminal",
is similar to "This person is so bad -
now we deny him the right to study and fondle Panties."

As I have described elsewhere,
such a philosophy is utter insanity,
BECAUSE it demands of decent people to become evil
to (minor or major) criminals or to insane people.

It is an insane act to leave an insane person insane
or to make him more insane,
and committing such an evil act,
directly backfires onto the person who does so - or
onto the person who makes others do so.

Therefore every person has the undeniable right
to study and fondle Panties.

Tony Sidaway - The Panty Inspector

Copyright 1995 by Tony Sidaway

Footnote 1: Panty-Sniffers are defined as any people
who study and try to fondle Panties.}

Footnote 2: AHS: Anthony H. Sidaway in
`The Philadelphia Doctorate Course'
of Panties (1981).}

Copyright 1995 by Tony Sidaway

reference:
PI-50R-Ci 'Archives of RI-xxi and RI-ACT-xx series'
of 28 Dec 1994, Revised and Replaced 1 Feb 1995

[dedicated with much affection and admiration to the estimable Koos Nolst Trenite, in the hope that he will forgive my presumption in borrowing some of his wise words]