Re: Interpol Duped

In <3satgt$rl7@covina.lightside.com> cmiller@lightside.com (Chris Miller) writes:

>Wayne McGillivray wrote:
>>Chris,
>>If you're a cultie, why don't you just crawl back under the rock
>>you came from and leave the intelligent conversation to the adults.
>>Children like you should be seen (as little as possible) and heard
>>not at all.
>>Wayne
>You're sick Wayne. You need an enema or something to deal with your
>bad humor.
Pardon me if I'm wrong, but aren't you the same Chris Miller who was just decrying the use of language and phrasing you considered offensive here on this very newsgroup?

You would do well to review the history of this newsgroup. It's very easy to lose credibility here, as you have discovered. Mr. Milne lost his credibility by selectively misquoting things, making articles that were highly criticle of the CoS appear to be praising CoS somehow. Vera lost her credibility with ad-hominem attacks and hypocrisy such as "outing" people. Woody... well, I'm not sure he ever really had any credibility, because his comments are usually off-topic and bear little evidence of cognition, analysis, or evaluation occurring before his fingers hit the keys.

As I'm sure you will find out, your statement will be the brunt of jokes that in no way further your cause. It will only increase the derision of the "Church." I'm sure jokes about your post and clearing or body thetans will follow.

People don't have the short memory that you expect. We have not forgotten your claims. We have not forgotten that you have made allegations against posters here which could constitute libel, unless you can produce proof of your allegations -- something you have been singularly unwilling to do. We have not forgotten that you claim to have a daughter working for the law firm that is representing Dennis Erlich, and we are aware that you have not verified that claim. We're also aware that if you do in fact have such a daughter, that any misuse of her position or access to Dennis' lawyers would constitute a serious Federal crime (interfering with a case in Federal court).

You may still be able to salvage some credibility. I urge you to come clean, and answer these questions in a straightforward, simple, non-evasive manner. That will have the best chance of reflecting well upon the organization of which you are a member, and which you are defending.

-- --Rob Levandowski Computer Interest Floor associate / University of Rochester macwhiz@cif.rochester.edu [Opinions expressed are mine, not UR's.]