Re: Antis still don't get it

In article <3uk500$qa8$1@mhafm.production.compuserve.com>, Robert Marcus <102020.1551@CompuServe.COM> wrote:

> Uh, It is rather unfathomable that I still recieve a lot of
> e-mail from the Anti CofS Cultists when I have stated over and
> over again I do not read their mail. I mean over and over and
> over again.
(Bobbie has his fingers jammed into his ears "I can't hear you!" I'm not listening! I can't hear you!...[sings] OHHH SAY CAN YOU SEEEEEEEE!!!!...)

> Like talking to little children. Maybe that is the
> reason -- they sexually are abusing children and therefore have
> taken on the identities of little children, having to be told
> over and over again something. If they have something to say,
> which they don't actually, they should just post it right here.
> Simple? Yes.
There you have it folks, nut-cult reasoning at its best!!!

If you respond to bobbie by email, you must be a child molester!!!

Jeez, too bad our respective police forces haven't discovered this simple but effective tool for weeding that type of offender out.

Bobbie, you're a nut, but a rare one. Weren't you leaving?

-Changii

-- Sri Changiana Saar, Merchant of Chaos, SP3! Crown Supplier to the Knights of Xenu "I think, therefore I'm overqualified to be a $cientologist."

"I am afraid their [Scientology's] claim of teaching 1.5 million children in South Africa to read is just another fabrication." - Johan Klopper, Second Secretary, South African Embassy.

"The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors." 17 USC 107