Scientology: that roc

emccoy@jade.mv.net (Elizabeth McCoy)

>Hillel wrote:
>Hillel <gazit@lear.cs.duke.edu> wrote: [bunch of good dialogue about tolerance for gays]

>(And none of them (so far) has sued net posters to shut them up.)
>(And none of them (so far) has sued net posters to shut them up.) >
> >Or net service providers. *That* was bloody daft.
>Or net service providers. *That* was bloody daft. >
> >--emccoy@jade.mv.net

>--emccoy@jade.mv.net


    Excuse me for butting in ...


    but the reason Netcom had to be in the suit was to ensure the
    venue was out of any jurisdiction like Central District
    Federal court.  (where the scienos are known and detested)


    Suing Netcom is the same as suing Pacific Bell when someone
    swears at you on the phone.


    Tom was included cause they don't like him not knuckling
    under.


    They had to get the case out of LA.  I don't really think the
    9th Circuit Appeal Court is gonna be happy with their endless
    delaying tactics (like not producing the poodle and other
    documents) either.


    Gonna put the poodle on a little leash and parade him around.


            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"