Pain and Sex (was: More from the rpf coo)By an274865@anon.penet.fi (Andrew McPherson)Tue, 4 Jul 1995 19:49:03 UTC
>Tony Sidaway
The article PAIN AND SEX was humbly gifted to mankind on August 26, 1982.
ElRon wrote these words:
"There are two items in this universe that cause more trouble than many
others combined.
"One is PAIN.
"The other is SEX.
"One should know more about these things.
Hubbard then engages in his holy war against his perceived enemies:
"Despite the false data of Freud, psychologists, psychiatrists and other
criminals, they are not native to a being. They are only artificial
wavelengths. They have exact frequencies that can be manufactured. A being
or a machine can synthesize either one.
As we see, psychologists are psychiatrists are collectively called
criminals. I wonder whether any organization representing these professions
would object to such statements. In fact the question arises whether you
can call the members of a profession as a whole to be criminals. Let us
hope some legal wit is reading ars.
And so sex is nothing but a wavelength which can be "manufactured". I
wonder whether Co$ has such a wavelength-machine under development. They
would no longer have to sell any of their "religion". Instead they could
engage in selling their sex-machine. Would be easier to sell, would put ars
out of business and Woody would get his personal machine for being upstat.
"Sex is a lock on and perversion of the "joy of creation" which involves a
whole being and expands him, but by using just one wavelength, sex, this
can be perverted and he contracts.
....
"When sex enters the scene, a being fixates and loses power.
Seriously: Here Hubbard clearly demonstrates one of the major defects of
his whole thing: He does not even vaguely understand that human beings are
not machines but feeling entities. But then feelings would probably just be
dramatizations of past events, even if pleasurable, so feelings are bad.
You all notice this defect in the arguments of most of the Co$ posters.
They can NOT understand what you try to tell them. It is not that they
would not want to, but when a person looses all his feelings in exchange
for an artificial rationality then of course he cannot understand what
actually is happening in the world around him. It is like trying to explain
to a blind man the colours red or green.
And now Hubbard finally tells us where the idea of sex actually came from
(looks like some Xenu competition):
"Destructive creatures who do not want people big or reaching - since they
are terrified of punishment due to their crimes - invented pain and sex to
shrink people and cut their alertness, knowingness, power and reach.
"Thus, you see people who are "experiencing" either pain or sex
introverting and not producing much.
"Pain and sex were the INVENTED tools of degradation.
Now I for one don't buy this nonsense of sex causing one to then work less.
In fact it seems just be the other way around: Where a person has a
fulfilled sex life one normally considers this to be one of the expressions
of a successful marriage. Happiness at home is a primary factor for a
productive work life.
It is not just a weird idea that in certain companies you PLUS your spouse
are invited to dinner with the boss and his wife before final decisions of
promotion to executive positions are being made. Where a happily married
couple is observed this serves as a sign indicating responsibility, the
spouse's support of your career, plus some sort of guarantee that the
company won't be surprised by a new executive who has nothing else to do
than to take out troubles at home on his work force.
Of course, where you indoctrinate a married couple that sex is no good you
deny them feelings, feelings which would let the two grow together even
more closely. This probably is one of the purposes of this bulletin: It is
easier to separate married people because one of them is needed in Alaska
while the other has to set up Bejing mission over the next five years. It
is also easier to get husband or wife to write knowledge reports about the
other. Lots of things are easier when you can assure that no other loyalty
can really develop than the one to Miscavige ben Hubbard ben Crowley ben
Xenu. But then of course we should not forget that Hubbard's familiy life
was troublesome to some degree letting his wife go to jail and many other
incidents.
And Hubbard has observed more things:
"Lovers are seldom happy.
All this is, according to Hubbard, "provable electronic fact."
Now one sentence makes me wonder whether the infamous OT VIII bulletin,
which Saint Dennis believes to be a fabrication not by Hubbard might not
after all be of ElRon's hand. Speaking of pain and sex, Hubbard says: "They
are the most-used tool in the campaign against beings in furthering the
general goal of those creatures whose sole ambition is destruction. ....
They destroyed every great civilization to date and are hard at work on
this one.
Over to you Saint Dennis.
Andrew
| |||