Re: Narconon

The deluded "scientist" Chris Schafmeister posted in part:

* But whatever they say, it doesn't change the fact * that most drugs do not lodge in fat tissue.

[snippy scientific "knowledge"]

* That's science that is and it doesn't depend on what * any "experts" have to say.

* "Biophysics . . . THE future." INTERNET: schaf@cgl.ucsf.edu

Chris, you'll blow a gasket on this line of reasoning. Look at it from the Scieno view from within the tautology. They are the only sane beings on the planet. What they know is truth, because they are free of their engrams and BT's. We, however, are chock full of both. Our alledged "reactive minds" are crawling with BT's, like ear mites on a mangy dog. We are ruled by our aberations, and nothing can change that. Hubbard built a system that explains EVERYTHING that can ever happen. Your knowledge of biophysics is all implants. Your criticism of the Purification rundown and Narconon is a result of these aberrations, and you are a sick thetan desperately in need of help. Anything that opposes scientology is the work of implants in our aberrated banks. That's why they'll never admit to any outside knowledge: they can't! It isn't real. Even worse, it's actively false, not just wrong. It is an attack by the implanters in a 75 million year old war. These people are still fighting Xenu's war, with you and me cast as the implanted Markabs that continue our pre-programmed course to destroy scientology.

For this reason you can talk biophysics until you're blue in the face. You could walk them into a lab and force them to watch a test of sweat for excretions and they wouldn't believe you. All they would see is a conspiracy by implanted, aberrated thetans to trick them into straying from the path to freedom. You can see this attitude even in the Free Zoners. Read some of Homer's articles: he refers to people "outside the faith" as lower life forms. His latest rant about OT powers compares the abilities of humans and "gods". It also finalized my loss of respect for him. It is a central belief that if you aren't one of them, you are sick and an opponent to their path. They won't believe your experiences as real. They won't believe your research is real.

Even the most respected scientologist on this newsgroup has the basics of this viewpoint. You can see it in the postings by Dennis of his email conversation with Elizabeth McCoy. I have resisted criticising Elizabeth because she has always demonstrated intelligence and critical thought here. But it bothered me when, in her responses to Dennis, she consistently responded with "no data" whenever Dennis related his experiences. This is wrong, Dennis IS data. His experiences are data whether you believe him or not. But Elizabeth's responses seem to indicate that she views Dennis as having an agenda that invalidates anything he says. Well, everybody here has an agenda. We all have opinions and prejudices, even Elizabeth. Mr. Dunn's experiences are data pointing to the results of the scientology tautology. Dennis's experiences are data that point to abuses by the cult. They cannot simply be dismissed because you haven't seen them. It is the start of the tautology. That which you don't experience is not real, or is a lie. If Elizabeth reads this, please don't take this as a flame, and if I'm wrong please correct me. But it unsettled me to see you respond in this way.

So Chris, why bother? Aim your criticism towards the readers who pop in. I decided a few weeks ago to stop posting refutations to the cult members here because I realized I wasn't going to change their minds. I'm not in a position to: Hubbard already built the structure within which anything I said could safely be ignored. So I only post now to provide an analysis to readers: for other aberrees. I post excerpts from Hubbard to counter their lies, and call them on their own failings for the sake of those others reading. If anyone inside the cult is gonna mock it, well let them. I'm no longer interested in setting them straight. I only want to get the word out on them to prevent others from joining.

That's my rant for the day. Anyone who knows of a way to break down a tautological system let me know. Repeated application of forehead sure doesn't work. Neither does non-scientology "knowledge".

-- / Xenu stole my lunch money \ / Andy Testa (KoX) I'm OT! I could KILL you with \ \ testa@hou.moc.com a thought! BWAAAHHAAAAHAAAAAA! / \ Contributing to the downfall of Scientology since 1995. /