Re: A Critical Examination of the First Amendment and the CoS. (Part 3)

Jeffrey S. Harrison <Jeffrey.harrison@m.cc.utah.edu> wrote:

>one of their clients. The suit against Support.com and its newsgroup
>one of their clients. The suit against Support.com and its newsgroup >administrator has since been dropped. However, according to Erlich, the
>administrator has since been dropped. However, according to Erlich, the >Church of Scientology is attempting to reinstate its suit against
>Church of Scientology is attempting to reinstate its suit against >Support.com.
>Support.com. The suit has not been dropped !! This error has been made by people a couple of times, and each time has been corrected ! Allen Hacker made this error, and corrected it immediately. The court only lifted the TRO against netcom and support.com.

>One of the principle cases to be used in Scientologyıs prosecution of
>One of the principle cases to be used in Scientologyıs prosecution of >Erlich is Bridge Publications, Inc. v. Vien.29 In Vien, a woman named
>Erlich is Bridge Publications, Inc. v. Vien.29 In Vien, a woman named >Enid Vien broke away from the Church of Scientology to form her own
>Enid Vien broke away from the Church of Scientology to form her own >religion. At the heart of Vienıs religion was a ³Dynamism² course that
>religion. At the heart of Vienıs religion was a ³Dynamism² course that >she offered for sale. This Dynamism course consisted of bootlegged or
>she offered for sale. This Dynamism course consisted of bootlegged or >copied Church of Scientology copyrighted material including a series of
>copied Church of Scientology copyrighted material including a series of >tapes and printed volumes. Vien either copied the materials or gave the
>tapes and printed volumes. Vien either copied the materials or gave the >material to her students to copy. She claimed that because Scientology
>material to her students to copy. She claimed that because Scientology >would not sell the materials to her and her students, the establishment
>would not sell the materials to her and her students, the establishment >clause and freedom exercise clause were being violated. Summary judgment
>clause and freedom exercise clause were being violated. Summary judgment >for Bridge Publications was granted and Vien eventually abandoned her
>for Bridge Publications was granted and Vien eventually abandoned her >appeals.
>appeals. Vien has no more money, thats all. There is a similar lawsuit against Mayo that was won !!

>Not only is the Church of Scientology proceeding with these raids, it has
>Not only is the Church of Scientology proceeding with these raids, it has >continued to use the cancel message commands to remove postings
>continued to use the cancel message commands to remove postings >containing as little as two or three words of a copyrighted text. If any
>containing as little as two or three words of a copyrighted text. If any >illegal activities are taking place on ARS, it would appear to be the
>illegal activities are taking place on ARS, it would appear to be the >cancellation of these messages critical of Scientology.
>cancellation of these messages critical of Scientology. There has been no more raid.

>END
>END Sad is that your article will probably published, because its language sounds like real work. The contents show a very short and poor research.

Tilman

--- Tilman Hausherr          [KoX, 1.9, DB]

biz:  tilman@sietec.de                 <a href="http://www.sietec.de/">http://www.sietec.de/</a>(company page)
home: tilman@berlin.snafu.de           <a href="http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/">http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/</a>


  Praise Xenu, Mozilla and "Bob"!  (and say "Hi" to Warren McShane !)