Vera/Chris/RonArtist modus

Since Vera/Chris/RonArtist/Woody/et al can't use the Earl Cooley method attack very well over the net, they must resort to the "covertly hostile" criminal cult argumentation technique:

b) By being knowingly covertly hostile

Purpose: To train the PRO to handle an SP reporter by word alone without the use of force as in (a). He uses the word as a rapier and plunges it in at the reporter, so that the reporter introverts and drops the question.

Method: The PRO and reporter sit across a table and the reporter asks SP type questions.

The PRO observes what would be a button in relation to the question asked and throws this back with good TR 1 so that it reaches home. If the reporter is introverted the PRO is successful. If the reporter persists with the same question the PRO should not re-press the same button - it obviously didn't work. He should drop it and use another one. If the PRO cannot think of a snide reply the reporter should just say "flunk, you haven't handled me. Start" - or some such remark - but should not tell the PRO what to say. When the confusion has come off the PRO will be able to handle and have a big win.

The drill is completed when the PRO is willing to create a cave in with an accurate snide remark, question or statement.

---



The moral, critics?  Mostly ignore the criminal cult bait.


I usually don't completely ignore the bait or accusation, but rather
use a few words to refute with a statement that can authoritatively
disprove the bait.  Then I continue wit the original tack unabated.


-- 
Grady Ward       |                                          |
grady@netcom.com |                                          |

1.0      707 826 7715  |                                          | A91F2740531E6801