Re: Something odd about WoodyBy sgoehrin@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (scott goehring)31 May 1995 07:54:57 GMT In article <9505310617.aa16498@dispatch.demon.co.uk>, <stark@prostar.com> wrote:
>I just noticed something extrememly odd about Woody of Borg.
>I observed that, while he posts 40 or so messages a day like our
>For last Friday, his first message was posted at 11:16am (these
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 20 16 1 2 9 0 6 0 12 12 4 9 10 0 4 1 3 12 9 8 11 0 24 10 0 7 3 6 12 0 10 4 0 0 0 6 13 0 19 14 7 0 16 20 14 0 17 17 0 14 18 16 15 0 27 43 0 19 20 16 16 0 10 37 23 16 11 18 17 16 16 0 20 27 28 10 18 1 10 0 4 4 2 0 19 0 0 0 0 6 18 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 notice that he never posts before 8 AM, or after 8 PM. he rarely posts after 7 PM except on Thursday and Friday (maybe he's making sure he's on stat for the week?). Wednesday and Thursday mornings are more popular. Wednesday late morning and early afternoon are dead time (maybe they debrief then?) otherwise, he tends to hit his stride in the mid-afternoon. doesn't seem to take a consistent lunch. gets off early on Tuesdays. normally doesn't post on sunday, but has occasionaly posted a few articles after 5. favorite time seems to be Tuesdays around 3 PM. he's been pretty consistent at getting out close 50 messages per day, at least since the 15th. the 21st was the only Sunday he's posted at all. notably, he had 48+48+39+51+48+49=283 message coming into that Sunday. he posted 17, for a nice round 300. methinks he logged in Sunday to get his stats up--300 appears to have been his goal that week. let's see. the following week: 48,50,48,57,57,55: 315. 5% growth. can we expect 330 this week, woodster? or, rather, 330.75, but that's kinda hard, so maybe it should be 331 instead... my count shows you're behind: you've only got 78 thru Tuesday. 252 to go! my archives get spotty before May 15, so someone else will need to check his counts to see if he was targeting specfic values before then. there are additional factors involved here that some readers are already aware of, but that i would prefer not to discuss at this time.
| |