David's Scientology home

Please visit my other project

where amazing people meet

Is "WOODY" Really a $cientologist?

By visnet@onramp.net (Sri Changiana Saar)
20 Jun 1995 13:31:03 GMT

I recently, for software reasons, had to dump my killfile. I've since recreated it, of course, but I was able to (forced to) see some of Woody's posts in the meantime. It got me to thinking....

I'm beginning to suspect we're being trolled.

Now I know you're going to say "No, that's Rocky Sherwood, not Ricky Sherwood", but I'm already aware of the difference between the two. I really mean that there is a possibility that "Ricky Sherwood" is doing an ADMIRABLE, not to mention THANKLESS job of stirring up outrage against the Co$.

For those who follow the little clam's posts, I've got some honest questions, by which I mean I don't already know the answers.

1) Has Woody (unlike Milne, Vera or "Chris") ever shown himself to have privaleged information? If so then I'm wrong and there is probably no chance of him being a troll.

2) Have you ever noticed Woody to say ANYTHING that WOULDN'T stir up animosity towards the cult?

3) Can you think of a better way to get lurkers and newcomers to go ballistic against the Co$ than reading Woody's posts?

I really, really suspect Woodster of being the ultimate Anticlam.

On the other hand, here's some evidence that I might be wrong:

*) Woodster was probably responsible for over 80% of the vertical spam back in the Great Deluge of A.R.S. That is just a guestimate on my part, those who follow (or better yet compile) the clammer kill-count could tell us the exact percentage.

So what it comes down to is this:

Is Woody the COMPLETE IDIOT he seems, or is he a clever chef posing as a clam?

My vote is still for COMPLETE IDIOT, but I'm beginning to wonder...

-Changii

-- Clamspores!